The PRA published Policy Statement PS6/25, outlining measures to strengthen the supervision of branches and subsidiaries of foreign banks, while supporting the UK’s competitiveness.

The PRA has published Consultation Paper 12/25, marking the first phase of a two-stage review of its Pillar 2A methodologies and supporting guidance. This consultation seeks to address the consequential impacts of the PRA’s near-final rules for implementing the Basel 3.1 standards, while also providing additional clarity on its Pillar 2A methodologies.

As part of PS7/25, the PRA has published further details on its approach for calculating SME and infrastructure lending adjustments.

Arriving hot on the heels of our earlier article on what the 2025 Bank Capital Test Means for small- and medium-sized banks, the Prudential Regulation Authority (PRA) has quietly published an accompanying set of stress parameters. These include both rates-up (supply shock) and rates-down (demand shock) scenarios, and can serve as a useful benchmark for firms not participating in concurrent stress testing. They may be particularly helpful for use in internal stress testing exercises, including within the Internal Capital Adequacy Assessment Process (ICAAP).

With the Bank of England’s 2025 Bank Capital Stress Test now in motion, small and medium-sized banks should take note. While only the large banks participate directly, it is nonetheless of interest for other firms as they approach their next stress testing exercise. The latest publications bring stress parameters up to date from the 2024 Desk-based Stress Test, and some elements have changed. This article explores what banks can take away from the latest stress programme and how to reflect those developments in their own risk management processes.

Today, the Prudential Regulation Authority (PRA), in consultation with HM Treasury, announced a one-year delay to the implementation of Basel 3.1 in the UK. Originally scheduled to take effect on 1 January 2026 for banks not classified as Small Domestic Deposit Takers (SDDTs), the new implementation date is now set for 1 January 2027.

Mark Your Calendar: Key Dates for Basel 3.1 and SDDT. It has been approximately three months since the PRA released the second part of its near-final rules for implementing the Basel 3.1 standards in the UK. With the official implementation date of 1 January 2026 less than a year away, the clock is ticking for firms to ensure compliance. While the implementation date of 1 January 2026 is top of mind for many, it is essential not to overlook several key milestones in 2025. These will be particularly relevant both for firms seeking SDDT status and banks navigating Basel 3.1 requirements.

The Prudential Regulation Authority (PRA) published Consultation Paper 8/24 ‘Definition of Capital: restatement of CRR requirements in PRA Rulebook’ (CP8/24) covering various matters relating to own funds including revocation by HM Treasury (HMT) of related rules set out in inter alia Regulation (EU) No 575/2013 (the CRR) and transferring them, with certain modifications, into the PRA Rulebook.

On 12 September 2024, the PRA published Consultation Paper 7/24 (The Strong and Simple Framework: The simplified capital regime for Small Domestic Deposit Takers (SDDTs)) as part of its Phase 2 of announcements, which sets out the proposed simplified capital regime for SDDTs.

This article outlines the changes to exposures to MDBs under the standardised approach of credit risk, as part of UK’s implementation of Basel 3.1 (PS9/24).

This article provides an overview of the near-final rules regarding the off-balance sheet items under the standardised approach, as part of the UK's implementation of Basel 3.1 (PS9/24).

On 12 September 2024, the Prudential Regulation Authority (PRA) published the second part of its near-final rules on the implementation of Basel 3.1 standards through Policy Statement 9/24 (PS9/24). This article focuses on the key changes in comparison to the PRA’s earlier consultation paper(s), in each of the major risk areas.

We recently sponsored a webinar - hosted by UK Finance - focussing on the key requirements of which banks must take account with respect to their current or planned relationships with deposit aggregators. Download a copy of the slides here.

PRA in the supervisory statement SS2/24 outlines requirements around solvent exit planning and execution. This article summarises the requirements and provides specific action points that small- and medium-sized banks can consider to implement these requirements.

In this webinar, we will provide an overview of the key requirements banks must take account of with respect to their current or planned future relationships with deposit aggregators. Specifically, this will include: Prudential risk: liquidity risk management and liquidity stress testing implications; Liquidity regulatory reporting: implications for calculation and treatment of deposits; and, Depositor protection (Financial Services Compensation Scheme coverage), and third party and outsourcing risk.

NMD are liabilities whereby the depositor is free to withdraw their deposit at any time since there is no defined contractual maturity date. Similarly, banks are typically able to adjust the interest rate attached to NMD on a unilateral basis. Despite the contractually short-term nature (using a repricing basis) of NMD, certain NMD or portions thereof may behave like longer-term, interest rate-insensitive positions. The inherent characteristics of NMD create complexities from the perspective of measuring, and in turn managing, IRRBB, meaning that a more involved approach is necessary.

Interest Rate Risk in the Banking Book (IRRBB) relates to both present and future risks to a bank’s capital and earnings arising from fluctuations in market interest rates. In recent years, IRRBB has become an area of increased focus for regulators: this has coincided with significant changes in the interest rate environment across major economies, the ending of an extended period of near-zero rates, high inflation, and industry events such as the failure of Silicon Valley Bank.

Effective 1 January 2022, the PRA implemented new requirements and expectations for banks, including creation of a regulatory limit for IRRBB and implementation of a Standardised Framework (SF) that banks may elect to follow.

On 12 December 2023, the Prudential Regulation Authority (PRA) published near-final rules on the implementation of Basel 3.1 standards through Policy Statement 17/23 (PS17/23). PS17/23 covers near-final rules on market risk; credit valuation adjustment (CVA) and counterparty credit risk (CCR); operational risk; interactions with the PRA’s Pillar 2 framework; and, re-denominate currency references to pound sterling (GBP).

The Prudential Regulation Authority (PRA) has introduced the Strong and Simple Framework for domestic banks and building societies that are non-systemic. The banks and building societies that meet the eligibility criteria are classified as Small Domestic Deposit Takers (SDDT) firms.

PRA’s Policy Statement PS15/23 (The Strong and Simple Framework: Scope Criteria, Liquidity and Disclosure Requirements) specifies the finalised SDDT criteria and prudential regulations for features (e.g., liquidity) not relating to capital requirements.

This article outlines the primary risks to banks linked to the utilisation of Deposit Aggregators (DAs) and proposes mitigating measures as outlined in the Dear CFO letter issued by the Prudential Regulation Authority (PRA) on November 15, 2023 and the Dear CEO letter in April 2021.